Anyway, it got me to thinking (which is usually a painfull experience), and I decided to do a little experiment. For the last few days, while surfing BlogExplosion and BlogAzoo I've kept a log of how many conservative and liberal sites I came accross. Now, to be clear, I limitted the labelling to the content of the blog. Just because the author was homosexual, I didn't label it a "liberal blog". And just because there were links to "Blogging for Bush", I didn't automatically label it a "conservative blog". Basically, I only included blogs in this analysis that contained at least one politically oriented post on the first page. I also made sure to note the blog title so as not to double count any. And here is what I discovered . . .
Of the politically oriented sites I was directed to approximately 46% were liberally oriented and 54% conservative. A far cry from my perception that conservative sites greatly outnumbered liberal ones. But, there's more to it than that. I also made note of the "degree" of right/left tone the blog took. Essentially, the sites that laid out the author's opinions/ideology in a civil, concise manner were labelled simply "conservative" or "liberal", while those blogs that were littered with insults, attacks, stereotypical diatribe, etc. were labeled as "extreme". And this, I think, is where my misperception stemmed from. You see, of the liberal leaning blogs, it was about a 60/40 mix of reasonable expression vs. extremism. But of the conservative leaning ones, fully 81% consisted of derrogatory, insulting, name-calling, vitriolic diatribe. And that, I believe, is what stands out most--what influences the perceptions the greatest. The hate sites are the ones that leave an impression, and statistically speaking there are about twice as many "extremist" conservative blogs as there are liberal ones (at least, in my sampling of BE & BA). But to those who ascribe to the extremist views, only those opposing views will stand out, so the perception will be that BE & BA are "flooded" with sites expressing the "other side".
|cheap supra shoes |
September 16, 2012 10:06 AM PDT
This post is awesome,ecpecting the newest!!!LIKE IT LIKE IT LIKE IT!!!,291197,http://nomadechoes.blogdrive.com/archive/198.html
|Moncler Outlet |
April 20, 2012 07:30 PM PDT
I smell the taste of wine. see you! "We do not talk more that day. We stood up, shook his hand and eye lookedeach and so on. Bees were shut out, but came to backhesitatingly.,632873,http://nomadechoes.blogdrive.com/archive/198.html
|ms. mac |
May 24, 2005 06:14 AM PDT
Frankly, I can't understand why anyone would feel the urge to read any blog which is quite clearly showing itself to be on either side of the political spectrum.
Surely the minute you declare yourself a "Blog for Bush" or even a "Blog for Blair" you are instantly only gaining yourself a readership which holds the same opinion as you or a readership at the opposite end of the spectrum who won't take anything you write seriously anyway.
And by the way, there are heaps more interesting things to be writing about, like Jake Gyllenhaal or Judy Greer! ;-)
May 23, 2005 07:23 PM PDT
That's so true, about the perception that BE had more conservative than liberal blogs, because I shared it. I can't say what it's like now as I blocked the political category on BE and life is much better now. I can't wait till one is able to block more than one, because the Business blogs will be next.
May 23, 2005 07:04 PM PDT
Hi Phil, Michele sent me!! Have a wonderful day!
May 23, 2005 09:22 AM PDT
Did you also discover you have too much time on your hands? ;)
Just kidding...that was actually interesting. I try not to be political on my blog...it makes people say nasty things in the comments and I like happy comments. :)
|Leave a Comment:|